DATES:
Name Address City Post Code Country Professional rank Sex Man Women Age Institution e - mail : Field / Departament Line of research
Name
Address
City Post Code Country
Professional rank Sex Man Women Age
Institution e - mail :
Field / Departament
Line of research
QUESTIONNAIRE:
1. To what extent do you agree with the following sentences?
1.1."History is to know the past as it was" NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.2. "History is made from documents"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.3. "History is made from documents and ideas"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.4. "History is the science of the past"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.5. "History is the science of society"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.6. "History is the science of men in time"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.7. "History is the sciene of men and women in time and within an environment"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.8. "History is not a science because it cannot know the objective truth of past events"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.9. "All history is contemporary"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.10. "Hisory is a fabrication of historians"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.11. "The historian knows the historical truth as he or she elaborates it"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.12. "History is daughter of her time"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.13. "The history of humanity is the history of class struggle"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.14. "Men make their own history, but not in circunstances of their own making"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.15. "Ideas are the motor of history"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.16. "The ultimate cause of history is economic"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.17. "History studies the past to understand the present and build the future"NoneLittleQuiteVery much 1.18. "The tendecy of history is progress"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.1."History is to know the past as it was" NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.2. "History is made from documents"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.3. "History is made from documents and ideas"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.4. "History is the science of the past"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.5. "History is the science of society"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.6. "History is the science of men in time"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.7. "History is the sciene of men and women in time and within an environment"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.8. "History is not a science because it cannot know the objective truth of past events"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.9. "All history is contemporary"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.10. "Hisory is a fabrication of historians"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.11. "The historian knows the historical truth as he or she elaborates it"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.12. "History is daughter of her time"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.13. "The history of humanity is the history of class struggle"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.14. "Men make their own history, but not in circunstances of their own making"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.15. "Ideas are the motor of history"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.16. "The ultimate cause of history is economic"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.17. "History studies the past to understand the present and build the future"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
1.18. "The tendecy of history is progress"NoneLittleQuiteVery much
Concepts, methods and approaches
2. Is it the task of the historian to seek historical truth? no yes
2.1. What do you understand by this 'truth'?
3. Does the historian influence the results of his or her research? no yes
3.1.If so, how? Knowledge, hypothesis, methodology Ideology , values, social conditionants
3.1.If so, how?
Knowledge, hypothesis, methodology Ideology , values, social conditionants
Knowledge, hypothesis, methodology
Ideology , values, social conditionants
4. Mark from 1 to 10 the following phases of the historian's work, where 1 means no importance at all and 10 means most important.
4.1 Choice of the subject of research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.2 Location and transcription of sources 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.3 Location and consultation of bibliography 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.4 Elaboration of preliminary hypothesis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.5 Analysis of obtained data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.6 Theoretical reflection 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.7 Elaboration of the scheme 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.8 Writing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.9 Conclusions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.10 Publishing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.11 Teaching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 4.12 Circulation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.1 Choice of the subject of research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.2 Location and transcription of sources 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.3 Location and consultation of bibliography 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.4 Elaboration of preliminary hypothesis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.5 Analysis of obtained data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.6 Theoretical reflection 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.7 Elaboration of the scheme 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.8 Writing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.9 Conclusions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.10 Publishing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.11 Teaching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
4.12 Circulation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
5. Score from 1 to10 in ascending level of importance each of the following concepts:
5.1 Regional monographs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 5.2 Quantitative history 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 5.3 Total History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 5.4 Problem-History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 5.5 Interdisciplinarity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
5.1 Regional monographs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
5.2 Quantitative history 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
5.3 Total History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
5.4 Problem-History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
5.5 Interdisciplinarity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
6. Does the causation of historical facts exist? no yes
6.1. If so, assess the type of causation: 6.1.1 Social-economicNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.2 Mental and culturalNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.3 PoliticsNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.4 ComplexNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.5 GlobalNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.6. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
6.1. If so, assess the type of causation:
6.1.1 Social-economicNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.2 Mental and culturalNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.3 PoliticsNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.4 ComplexNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.5 GlobalNoneLittleQuiteVery much 6.1.6. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
6.1.1 Social-economicNoneLittleQuiteVery much
6.1.2 Mental and culturalNoneLittleQuiteVery much
6.1.3 PoliticsNoneLittleQuiteVery much
6.1.4 ComplexNoneLittleQuiteVery much
6.1.5 GlobalNoneLittleQuiteVery much
6.1.6. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
7. Is an interdisciplinary approach necessary in historical studies? no yes
7.1 If so, what kind of interdisciplinarity ? 7.1.1 Among historical disciplines of different chronological or thematic areasNoneLittleQuiteVery much 7 1.2 Between history and the social sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much 7.1.3 Between history and the natural sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much 7.1.4 Between history and literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much 7.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
7.1 If so, what kind of interdisciplinarity ?
7.1.1 Among historical disciplines of different chronological or thematic areasNoneLittleQuiteVery much 7 1.2 Between history and the social sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much 7.1.3 Between history and the natural sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much 7.1.4 Between history and literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much 7.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
7.1.1 Among historical disciplines of different chronological or thematic areasNoneLittleQuiteVery much
7 1.2 Between history and the social sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much
7.1.3 Between history and the natural sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much
7.1.4 Between history and literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much
7.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8. Have you ever applied in your historical research the co-operation between general history and other historical disciplines? no yes
8.1.If so, specify: 8.1.1 Archeology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.2 Economic History NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.3 History of Law NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.4 History of Literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.5 History of Art NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.6 History of EducaciónNoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.7 History of Medicine NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.8 History of Sciene NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.9 History of Philosophy NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.10. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.If so, specify:
8.1.1 Archeology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.2 Economic History NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.3 History of Law NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.4 History of Literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.5 History of Art NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.6 History of EducaciónNoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.7 History of Medicine NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.8 History of Sciene NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.9 History of Philosophy NoneLittleQuiteVery much 8.1.10. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.1 Archeology NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.2 Economic History NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.3 History of Law NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.4 History of Literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.5 History of Art NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.6 History of EducaciónNoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.7 History of Medicine NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.8 History of Sciene NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.9 History of Philosophy NoneLittleQuiteVery much
8.1.10. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9. Have you ever applied in your historical research the co-operation between history and other sciences or disciplines? no yes
9.1 if so, specify: 9.1.1 GeographyNoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.2 EconomyNoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.3 Sociology NoneLittlevQuiteVery much 9.1.4 Anthropology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.5 Psychology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.6 Law NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.7 Political Science NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.8 Linguistics NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.9 Literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.10 Philosophy NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.11 Ecology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.12 Natural and Physical sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.13. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1 if so, specify:
9.1.1 GeographyNoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.2 EconomyNoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.3 Sociology NoneLittlevQuiteVery much 9.1.4 Anthropology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.5 Psychology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.6 Law NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.7 Political Science NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.8 Linguistics NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.9 Literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.10 Philosophy NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.11 Ecology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.12 Natural and Physical sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much 9.1.13. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.1 GeographyNoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.2 EconomyNoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.3 Sociology NoneLittlevQuiteVery much
9.1.4 Anthropology NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.5 Psychology NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.6 Law NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.7 Political Science NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.8 Linguistics NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.9 Literature NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.10 Philosophy NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.11 Ecology NoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.12 Natural and Physical sciencesNoneLittleQuiteVery much
9.1.13. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
10. What influence -if any- have new information technologies had on the writing of history? ----- none little quite very much
10.1 If so, how do you think they affect -or will affect - historians ? 10.1.1 Methodologically NoneLittleQuiteVery much 10.1.2 Historiographicall NoneLittleQuiteVery much 10.1.3 Epistemologically NoneLittleQuiteVery much 10.1.4 DidacticallyNoneLittleQuiteVery much 10.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
10.1 If so, how do you think they affect -or will affect - historians ?
10.1.1 Methodologically NoneLittleQuiteVery much 10.1.2 Historiographicall NoneLittleQuiteVery much 10.1.3 Epistemologically NoneLittleQuiteVery much 10.1.4 DidacticallyNoneLittleQuiteVery much 10.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
10.1.1 Methodologically NoneLittleQuiteVery much
10.1.2 Historiographicall NoneLittleQuiteVery much
10.1.3 Epistemologically NoneLittleQuiteVery much
10.1.4 DidacticallyNoneLittleQuiteVery much
10.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
11. Do you use Internet? no yes
11.1 What for ?
Subjects and lines of research
12. Mark from 1 to 10 in ascending level of importance the reasons that influence the choice of the subjects for historical research:
12.1 Personal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 12.2 Topical 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 12.3 Academic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 12.4 Scientific 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 12.5 Sociocultural 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 12.6 Political 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 12.7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
12.1 Personal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
12.2 Topical 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
12.3 Academic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
12.4 Scientific 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
12.5 Sociocultural 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
12.6 Political 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
12.7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
13. Why do you think historians change the subject of their research ?
13.1 They do not change NoneLittleQuiteVery much 13.2 Declining returns NoneLittleQuiteVery much 13.3 Social, political, economic, or religious pressures NoneLittleQuiteVery much 13.4 Historiographical mimicry NoneLittleQuiteVery much 13.5 Scientific innovation NoneLittleQuiteVery much 13.6 Personal strategies NoneLittleQuiteVery much 13.7. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
13.1 They do not change NoneLittleQuiteVery much
13.2 Declining returns NoneLittleQuiteVery much
13.3 Social, political, economic, or religious pressures NoneLittleQuiteVery much
13.4 Historiographical mimicry NoneLittleQuiteVery much
13.5 Scientific innovation NoneLittleQuiteVery much
13.6 Personal strategies NoneLittleQuiteVery much
13.7. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
14. Mark from 1 to 10 in ascending level of importance the following subdisciplines and lines of research:
14.1 Historical demography 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.2 Economic history 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.3 Social history 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.4 History of mentalities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.5 Cultural History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.6 Historical Biography 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.7 Political History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.8 Microhistory 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.9 Compared history 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.10 Historical sociology 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.11 Anthropological History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.12 Linguistic Turn 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.13 Oral History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.14 History of Women 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.15 Ecological History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.16 Multicultural History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.17 Local History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.18 Regional History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.19 National History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.20 Continental History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 14.21 World History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.1 Historical demography 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.2 Economic history 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.3 Social history 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.4 History of mentalities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.5 Cultural History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.6 Historical Biography 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.7 Political History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.8 Microhistory 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.9 Compared history 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.10 Historical sociology 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.11 Anthropological History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.12 Linguistic Turn 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.13 Oral History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.14 History of Women 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.15 Ecological History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.16 Multicultural History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.17 Local History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.18 Regional History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.19 National History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.20 Continental History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
14.21 World History 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
15. What is the interest in the study of conflicts, revolts and revolutions as subjects of historical research today? NoneLittleQuiteVery much
15.1Why?
16. Do you agree with the historical 'revisionism' of the French, English and Russian revolutions? NoneLittleQuiteVery much
16.1 Why ?
17 And of the Holocaust and the Facisms? NoneLittleQuiteVery much
17.1 Why ?
18 And of Comunism? NoneLittleQuiteVery much
18.1 Why ?
19 What should the future of the History of Women be?
19.1 None NoneLittleQuiteVery much 19.2 Hstorical field NoneLittleQuiteVery much 19.3 History of gender NoneLittleQuiteVery much 19.4 A common history of men and women NoneLittleQuiteVery much 19.5 Back into general history NoneLittleQuiteVery much 19.6. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
19.1 None NoneLittleQuiteVery much
19.2 Hstorical field NoneLittleQuiteVery much
19.3 History of gender NoneLittleQuiteVery much
19.4 A common history of men and women NoneLittleQuiteVery much
19.5 Back into general history NoneLittleQuiteVery much
19.6. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
Historiography
20. Which of the possible meanings of the term "historiography" do you find most accurate?
History History of history and of historians Set of historians
History
History of history and of historians
Set of historians
21. Do you find the balance of 20th century historiography positive ?
21.1 why ?
22. Have there been any historiographical changes from the sixties and seventies ? no sí
22.1 If so, assess these changes: For the worse For the better
22.1 If so, assess these changes:
For the worse For the better
For the worse
For the better
23. To what extent is a historiographical renewal still necessary today ? NoneLittleQuiteVery much
23.1 What do you understand by renewal?
24. Assess the interest for the professional historian of the reflection on:
24.1 Methodology NoneLittleQuiteVery much 24.2 Historiography NoneLittleQuiteVery much 24.3 Theory of History NoneLittleQuiteVery much 24.4 Theory of society NoneLittleQuiteVery much 24.5 Why?
24.1 Methodology NoneLittleQuiteVery much
24.2 Historiography NoneLittleQuiteVery much
24.3 Theory of History NoneLittleQuiteVery much
24.4 Theory of society NoneLittleQuiteVery much
24.5 Why?
25. What should the future of historiography as the history of history and historians be?
The task of the historian is to write history History of historiography Added activity Autonomous area of knowledge Intellectual history Without self-reflection, history has no future
The task of the historian is to write history
History of historiography
Added activity
Autonomous area of knowledge
Intellectual history
Without self-reflection, history has no future
26. Mark from 1 to 10 in ascending level of importance the following historiographical tendencies and currents of thought:
26.1 (Neo)positivism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 26.2 Annales 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 26.3 Historical materialism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 26.4 Enlightment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 26.5 Functionalism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 26.6 Structuralism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 26.6 Postmodernism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 26.7 (Neo)conservatism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 26.9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.1 (Neo)positivism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.2 Annales 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.3 Historical materialism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.4 Enlightment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.5 Functionalism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.6 Structuralism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.6 Postmodernism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.7 (Neo)conservatism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
26.9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -
27. Is the knowledge of the values and of the biography of historians important to contextualise and understand their works ? NoneLittleQuiteVery much
27.1 Why ?
28 Philosophers and social scientists that influence or have influenced historians:
28.1 Marx NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.2 Freud NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.3 Weber NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.4 Durkheim NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.5 Lévi-Strauss NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.6 Foucault NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.7. Habermas NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.8. Bourdieu NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.9. Derrida NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.10. Ricoeur NoneLittleQuiteVery much 28.11. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.1 Marx NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.2 Freud NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.3 Weber NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.4 Durkheim NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.5 Lévi-Strauss NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.6 Foucault NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.7. Habermas NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.8. Bourdieu NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.9. Derrida NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.10. Ricoeur NoneLittleQuiteVery much
28.11. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
29. What is the interest of history and of the theory of science for historiography? NoneLittleQuiteVery much
29.1 Relevance of these historians and philosophers of science to historiography: 29.1.1. Popper NoneLittleQuiteVery much 29.1.2. Kuhn NoneLittleQuiteVery much 29.1.3. Feyerabend NoneLittleQuiteVery much 29.1.4. Lakatos NoneLittleQuiteVery much 29.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
29.1 Relevance of these historians and philosophers of science to historiography:
29.1.1. Popper NoneLittleQuiteVery much 29.1.2. Kuhn NoneLittleQuiteVery much 29.1.3. Feyerabend NoneLittleQuiteVery much 29.1.4. Lakatos NoneLittleQuiteVery much 29.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
29.1.1. Popper NoneLittleQuiteVery much
29.1.2. Kuhn NoneLittleQuiteVery much
29.1.3. Feyerabend NoneLittleQuiteVery much
29.1.4. Lakatos NoneLittleQuiteVery much
29.1.5. NoneLittleQuiteVery much
30 How does the historical discipline evolve?
Accumulation Breaks Both Returns
Accumulation
Breaks
Both
Returns
31 Is there enough debate among historians at present ? no yes
31.1 Why ?