Name:


QUESTIONNAIRE:

Community of historians

32. What do historians share or have shared in the exercise of their profession ?

32.1 Nothing NoneLittleQuiteVery much

32.2 Subjects and lines of research NoneLittleQuiteVery much

32.3 Unwritten academic rules NoneLittleQuiteVery much

32.4 Elements of methodology NoneLittleQuiteVery much

32.5 Elements of theory NoneLittleQuiteVery much

32.6 Language NoneLittleQuiteVery much

32.7. NoneLittleQuiteVery much

 

33. What importance have or have had the values or paradigms shared by historians?

 

34 Score from 1 to 10 the importance of the means of transmission of historiographical paradigms:

34.1 Teaching

34.2 Masterpieces

34.3 Handbooks

34.4 Conferences

34.5 Journals

34.6 Personal Contact

34.7 Bibliography and scholarly publications

34.8.

 

35 Score from 1 to 10 in ascending level of importance the following 20th century historians:

35.1. M. Bloch

35.2. L. Febvre

35.3. F. Braudel

35.4. E. J. Hobsbawm

35.5. J. Le Goff

35.6. C. Sánchez Albornoz

35.7. E. P. Thompson

35.8. M. Tuñón de Lara

35.9. P. Vilar

35.10.

 

36 Score from 1 to 10 in ascending order the following contexts and forms of sociability of historians:

36.1 Teams

36.2 Department

36.3 Institute

36.4 College

36.5 Field of knowledge

36.6 National Historiography

36.7 International Historiography

36.8 Scholary exchange

36.9 Personal Networks

36.10 Conferences

36.11 Journals

36.12 Internet

36.13.

 

37. What kind of relations are there among the historigraphies of the various countries and continents?

37.1 If you consider they exist, what kind are they ?

Unequal interchange

Equal interchange

Free competition

37.2 How do you think historiographical relations should be ?

37.2.1 In what terms?

Unequal interchange

Equal interchange

Free competition

37.2.2 Why?

  

38. What national historiografies have a greater influence on our discipline nowadays ?:

38.1 German

38.2 Argentinan

38.3 Brasilian

38.4 Spanish

38.5 North American

38.6 French

38.7 Hindi

38.8 British

38.9 Italian

38.10 Japonese

38.11 Mexican

38.12 Russian

38.13.

 

39. What effect has or will globalisation have on the traditional relations of historigraphical dependence in favour of more developed countries?

39.1 Why?

 

40. Which factor(s) make national historiography capable of autonomous thought?

40.1 Historiographical tradition NoneLittleQuiteVery much

40.2 Academic formation NoneLittleQuiteVery much

40.3 Intellectual capacity NoneLittleQuiteVery much

40.4 Inferiority complex NoneLittleQuiteVery much

40.5 Political SupportNoneLittleQuiteVery much

40.6 Economic Support NoneLittleQuiteVery much

40.7 Social Support NoneLittleQuiteVery much

40.8. NoneLittleQuiteVery much

 

41. Are post-colonial historiographies contributing something original to the community of historians? no yes

41.1. Examples

 

Fragmentation and globalisation

42. Do you agree with the current fragmentation of subjects, methods and historical specialities?

42.1 What do you think are its causes ?

 

43. Does the globalisation of economy, justice and information affect the writing of history? no yes

43.1 In what way ?

 

44. Does the framework of the nation-state remain as the most suitable one for the development of history and historiography ? no yes

44.1 Why?

44.2 Alternatives

 

45. The various historical, chronological or thematic specialities must:

Remain independent

Interchange experience

Converge

Mix

Merge

 

46. Should we favour the study of a chronological area? no

46.1 If so, which ?

 

47. Should we mantain the traditional division of our discipline in chronological areas ? no

47.1 Why ?

47.2 Alternatives

 

48. The different human and social sciences must:

Remain independent

Interchange experience

Converge

Mix

Merge

 

49. Should we attempt the establishment of a unified social science ? no yes

49.1 If so, around which discipline (s)?

49.1.1 None

49.1.2 History

49.1.3 Sociology

49.1.4 Economy

49.1.5 Anthropology

49.1.6.

 

50. What should we do with the concept of total history ?

Abandon it

Mantain it as a utopian horizon

Reconstruct it

Develop it as a line of research

 

51. What does post-postmodernism contribute to History?

51.1 Nothing

51.2 Pluralism,criticism, antidogmatism

51.3 Undermines the bases of history

51.4 A new theory of History

51.5 Destroys without providing alternatives

51.6 Is the History of the 21st century

51.7 Is a fad

51.8.

 

52. Do migratory movements and multiculturalism affect the writing of history? no yes

52.1 If so, how?

 

Social function of history

53 What purpose should history serve ?( Score from 1 to 10)

53.1 Critical Consciousness

53.2 The education of citizens

53.3 National Consciousness

53.4 Mutual respect

53.5 A better living

53.6 Transforming the world

53.7 Guide social action

53.8 Mouthpiece of the defeated

53.9 Learn about the past

53.10 Academic career

53.11 Cultural acquisition

53.12 Hobby

53.13 Entertainment

53.14 Professional vocation

53.15.

 

54. When writing up the result of your research, who are you addressing ?

54.1 No-one in particular

54.2 Other historians

54.3 A learned readership

54.4 Readers at large

54.5.

54.6 Why?

 

55. What should the attitude of the historian before the political power be?

Ignore it

Criticise it

Request finantial support

Transform it

 

56. What importance has history got in your country ?

56.1 Why ?

 

57. Score from 1 to 10 in ascending level of importance the situation of history in your country in the following areas:

57.1 Elementary and Secondary education

57.2 Higher education

57.3 Research

57.4 Cultural policy

57.5 Mass media

57.6 Public opinion

57.7.Internet

57.8 Literature

57.9.

 

58. What problems does the teaching of history face today ?

 

59. Are there professional opportunities for historians in your country ?

59.1 If so, in which fields?

 

60. Do neoliberal policies affect History and the human sciences ? no yes

60.1 In which way ?

 

61. What should be the historian's attitude towards ethical, social and political questions?

61.1 It is ideology and not History

61.2 I is the most important dimension of History

61.3 It rather affects him or her as a citizen

61.4 Assume it and mantain scientific rigour

61.5 We must conduct a human History

61 6.

 

62. Do you think that nationalism invents History ? no yes

62.1 If so, what should the historian's attitude ?

Remain neutral

Fight the invention of History

Reconcile tradition with scientific rigour

Assume the nationalist views

 

63. Does religious fundamentalism affect the writing of History ? no yes

63.1 In what way ?

 

64. Does neo-racism affect the writing of History? no yes

64.1 In what way?

 

65. What can History contribute to the future on the threshold of the 21st century?

65.1 Aniversaries and conmemorations

65.2 A historian is not a prophet

65.3 The future of history depends on the extent to which history worries about the future

65.4 The interaction we are interested in is past-present

65.5 History prevents our repeating the same errors

65.6 We should leave the future for other social sciences and disciplines

65.7 There are no alternative futures without a knowlege of the past

65.8.