Messages Lists
|
25/2/03 |
The owl of Minerva only extends its wings when the decline "Hegel arrives A Leal
Translation made in http//babel.altavista.com In original language
El búho de Minerva extiende sus alas sólo cuando llega el ocaso" Hegel A Leal
|
|
[Note Answer to the message of Juan Balduzzi "HaD. Presentation in +++++++"] Marx wrote works on which she happened in his time The 18 Brumario de Luis Bonaparte, the fight of classes in France, On the Commune of Paris, About the Free Change, etc. The question is They were historical texts? Everything seems to indicate that they were political texts. The historian who makes history of the present times runs the risk of invading the land of sociology, the economy, political science, the media, and in him of the opinion columns. (what it does not mean that we deny the interdisciplinariedad, nor the obligation for the historian to dominate to manifold disciplines, far from it that all historian speaks from the present) What can do to register the facts and to try to discover its tendency and its sense. Because as You raise it well, following Gramsci, the processes have not been revealed sufficiently. If the subjetivismo is an explicit danger, when we dealed with the past, it is much more evident when we spoke of a movement that still is in "movement". It is, for example, the problem of the globalización. I create firmly that still not even we have invented the concepts to denominate the phenomena that emerge before our glance. One says for example, that the nations been are disappearing, but what one sees is the decomposition of old nations been, of which are born others, marked by the ethnic thing, the linguístico, the monk, but after all, nations been. One says that the class fight was surpassed, but what it is appraised it is that the confrontation is universal, as antiglobalización is inferred of the gigantic marches. The historian, must investigate but not only think on the present time. It is part of intelligence and as so his to have ethical he is to pronounce itself. But he must have present, that most probable is than it is mistaken. To think about a "present history" as it disciplines is an unnecessary risk. EStan better orchestrated other professionals of human sciences, that make cuts ahistóricos that the historian, because this one moves in the time and the movements. It wanted to be able to talk more widely on this, because I consider that a thing is the interdisciplinariedad and another one the aim of the disciplines like such. Gustavo Quesada.
|